Selected Cases
The following are some examples of our appeals
Criminal: reversed felony DWI conviction and sentence, obtained re-sentencing as first-time misdemeanor
Held Illinois “zero-tolerance” offense conviction not requiring impairment could not enhance DWI charge in Missouri
The Weitz Company v. UMB Bank, N.A. , No. 18-3447 (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit 2019)
Commercial: our appeal led to a favorable settlement for a company whose claims against a bank were dismissed
Family: reversed order legally separating couple after wife died, and for husband to pay her share to her son
Held there cannot be a posthumous legal separation case, and the case simply had to be dismissed once the wife died
Civil procedure: questioned whether court could compel release of information years after case without hearing
Majority held settlement language allowed this; three-judge dissent would have held it required a contempt proceeding
Class actions: defeated defendants’ requests to appeal class action certification in Wiretap Act case
State v. Fitzpatrick , No. 14BS-CR01104 (Circuit Court of Bates County, Mo. 2018)
Criminal: obtained new trial on all charges in felony sexual offense case without having to appeal
Trial judge held that lawyer who represented defendant at trial had conflict of interest that violated Sixth Amendment
Family: reversed long-distance custody schedule and increase in child support for father who lived in Wisconsin
Held custody schedule failed to account for schoolyear holidays and child support order was insufficiently explained
Medical malpractice: upheld $900,000 wrongful death verdict after physician failed to diagnose impending stroke
Both appellate courts unanimously held none of the defendant physician’s many claims of trial error had any merit
Juvenile/Family: reversed outright the termination of our client’s parental rights over his three children
Held that there was no evidence of any abuse, neglect, or inability to parent legally justifying a termination
Named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2018, 1st half” (July 9, 2018)
Commercial: upheld $150,000 award of prejudgment interest on balance due under construction contract
Held that language the parties struck from their final contract could not create ambiguity as to the right to interest
Named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2018, 1st half” (July 9, 2018)
Family: vacated all proceedings in divorce modification and obtained new proceedings before different judge
That the judge was designated after the divorce but before the modification did not undo the right to a change of judge
Constitutional: reversing trial court, obtained writ commanding county collector to allow clients to bid at tax sales
Held clients had statutory right to be bidders and county collector lacked unilateral power to ban anyone from sales
Criminal/Municipal: representing city, reversed dismissal of city’s prosecution of defendant for inciting fight
Defendant’s claim of defense of property had to go to trial, and city’s disorderly conduct ordinance was constitutional
Civil Rights: reversed summary judgment dismissing race-discrimination claim against entertainment district
Plaintiff’s failure to list his claim on Chapter 7 bankruptcy did not judicially estop him from bringing it
There was sufficient evidence that plaintiff was victim of developer’s scheme to exclude African-Americans
Named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2017, 2nd half” (Jan. 8, 2018)
Tort: upheld $100,000 attorney fee award that lower appellate court had overturned
Clarified that a contingent-fee lawyer fired just before settlement still can be awarded a percentage of client’s recovery
Tort: upheld $9 million judgment for mentally disabled woman who repeatedly was raped by her caregiver’s husband
Held caregiver did not have official immunity, and none of caregiver’s other seven issues on appeal had any merit
Named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2016, 2nd half” (Jan. 3, 2017)
Criminal: obtained resentencing for client convicted and sentenced for possessing twice drug quantity he actually did
Eighth Circuit appointed us to represent the client on appeal from denial of post-conviction relief
State ex inf. White ex rel. Clements v. Cacioppo , No. 16CY-CV01441 (Cir. Ct. of Clay County, Mo. 2016)
Municipal: defeated prosecutor’s and mayor’s attempt to obtain writ of quo warranto ousting city councilman
Medical malpractice: obtained new trial for client paralyzed by air injected into his heart during routine procedure
Held trial court erred in denying client expert to rebut defense’s claim that injury resulted from device defect
State ex rel. Sternberg v. Byrn , No. SC95610 (Supreme Court of Missouri 2016)
Constitutional: questioned whether juvenile court could compel private lawyers to represent indigent parties for free
When Supreme Court issued writ and agreed to hear case, juvenile court withdrew lawyer, mooting the writ case
Family: upheld restraining order protecting client from brother who had attacked and severely injured him
Held justification by defense of property was affirmative defense that had to be proven, and brother had not proven it
Worker’s compensation: upheld $100,000 award to injured worker that lower court had overturned
Overruled 20 years of case law limiting temporary total disability awards to set term that was not in statute
Named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2015, 2nd half” (Jan. 4, 2016)
Employment: reversed $235,000 judgment against client for alleged breach of non-competition agreement
Held genuine material facts remained in dispute as to all issues, precluding summary judgment
Named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2015, 2nd half” (Jan. 4, 2016)
Bankruptcy: reversed denial of majority shareholder’s $3.8 million secured claim on corporation’s bankruptcy estate
Held client’s loans could not be recharacterized as equity infusions and secured claim could not be subordinated
Required bankruptcy court to allow the $3.8 million claim as the only secured claim in the bankruptcy
View our brief reply brief
Insurance: questioned whether insurer was required to pay $1 million malpractice judgment against disbarred lawyer
Court of Appeals held policy exclusion did not encompass loans conned from client, but Supreme Court disagreed
Court of Appeals decision named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2014, 1st half” (July 7, 2014)
Supreme Court decision named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2015, 1st half” (July 9, 2015)
Criminal: vacated felony DWI conviction and sentence, obtained re-sentencing as first-time misdemeanor
Held more lenient DWI law enacted shortly after defendant’s charge must be applied retroactively
Family: prevented wife’s former paramour from intervening in husband’s stepparent adoption to claim child custody
Named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2014, 2nd half” (Jan. 5, 2015)
Commercial: questioned whether statutory mechanic’s liens are subject to equitable subrogation in Arizona
Court of Appeals upheld $2.1 million summary judgment foreclosing on lien, but Supreme Court sent back for trial
Medical malpractice: questioned constitutionality of statute requiring third-party affidavit to sue
Named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2014, 1st half” (July 7, 2014)
Tort: restored grant of a new trial for a personal injury plaintiff that a lower appellate court had overturned
Held the trial court appropriately had found defendant’s expert witness committed perjury, warranting a new trial
First time since 1958 that the Supreme Court of Missouri reviewed the grant of a new trial due to perjury
Named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2014, 1st half” (July 7, 2014)
Family: clarified custody rights of husband who raised children born of wife’s extramarital affair
Allowed husband to file independent lawsuit seeking children’s third-party custody, in which he prevailed
Named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2014, 1st half” (July 7, 2014)
certiorari denied , 134 S.Ct. 1515 (U.S. Supreme Court 2014)
Employment: questioned whether unauthorized aliens could sue for wages they could not have been paid lawfully
Named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2013, 2nd half” (Jan. 6, 2014)
certiorari denied , 134 S.Ct. 784 (U.S. Supreme Court 2013)
Criminal: questioned whether FBI’s warrantless GPS tracking of defendant’s car violated Fourth Amendment
Tax: questioned whether county could impose higher commercial property tax on vacant, residentially-zoned land
Supreme Court majority held law allowed county to do this, two-judge dissent would have held it is unjust
Named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2013, 1st half” (July 8, 2013)
Criminal: overturned client’s felony theft conviction as unconstitutionally multiplicitous (double jeopardy)
Employment: defended trial court’s ruling that non-compete covenants against client were invalidly overbroad
Supreme Court limited some invalid covenants; better result for client than in lower appellate court
Named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2012, 2nd half” (Jan. 7, 2013)
certiorari denied , 132 S.Ct. 2783 (U.S. Supreme Court 2012)
Commercial: questioned whether federal court may refuse to follow state supreme court decision on state law
Obtained new opinion on rehearing petition in the Eighth Circuit
Persuaded the Eighth Circuit to stay $5.5 million judgment pending U.S. Supreme Court review
Tax: restored 149,000% reduction in agricultural landowner’s property tax that lower court had overturned
Land use: restored judgment declaring road to be private easement, which lower court had overturned
Clarified that the owner of land over which an easement runs cannot unilaterally destroy the easement
Re-established that defendants must specifically plead a statute of limitations defense or else the defense is waived
Constitutional: questioned whether town could charge fixed subclass of residents 750% higher sewer connection fee
Court of Appeals held disparity was “special law” in violation of state constitution, but Supreme Court disagreed
Featured on front page of Missouri Lawyers Weekly (Apr. 12, 2010 Dec. 13, 2010
Court of Appeals decision named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2010, 1st half” (July 6, 2010)
Supreme Court decision named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2010, 2nd half” (Jan. 2011)
Insurance: restored policyholder’s $475,000 verdict against its insurer that a lower appellate court had overturned
Established that, in “occurence” policy, date of the injury determines coverage, not date the injury was discovered
Named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2010, 1st half” (July 6, 2010)
Mid-Mo. Waste Systems v. Lafarge N. Am. , No. 09-3485 (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit 2010)
Commercial: our brief
Estate: overturned $325,000 settlement forced on beneficiary of estate worth more than twice that amount
Reiterated that an attorney’s arguments are not evidence and attorneys testifying must be sworn in like everyone else
Named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Major Opinions of 2009, 2nd half” (Jan. 4, 2010)
Phan v. State , No. 0816-CV36955 (Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri 2009)
Criminal: vacated decade-old felony conviction and 13-year prison sentence; prosecution did not appeal
Municipal: questioned whether city could prohibit bars allowing smoking indoors when state permitted bars to do so
Appeal was joined by world’s largest premium cigar manufacturer as amicus
Named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Important Opinions of 2009, 1st half” (July 7, 2009)
Named the Kansas City Daily Record ’s third “Top Story of 2009” (Dec. 29, 2009)
Covered in the Wall Street Journal , the Kansas City Star , and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch
Insurance: required insurance company to pay injured couple their $1.7 million judgment against its policyholder
Established that an insurer who agrees to defend its policyholder without reservation cannot later deny coverage
Named one of Missouri Lawyers Weekly ’s “Important Opinions of 2009, 1st half” (July 7, 2009)
Criminal: questioned whether non-“sex offender” could be supervised and treated like one as a condition of probation
First time since 1977 that a Missouri appellate court reviewed a probation condition
Constitutional: required state to delete person from its “sex offender” registry whom it had added retroactively
We handled the proceedings in both the trial court and the appellate court, succeeding at both levels
View our brie f
